Mont Allen
  • Home
  • C.V.
    • C.V.
    • Conference Sessions Organized
    • Conference Papers
    • Education
    • Fellowships
    • Invited Lectures
    • Publications
  • Teaching
  • Sarcophagus Memes
    • Sarcophagus Memes (highlights)
    • Sarcophagus Memes (all)
  • Roman Sarcophagus News (blog)
  • Classics & Art History at SIU
    • Classics at SIU
    • Art History at SIU

Sarcophagus carvers know the drill

3/3/2014

Comments

 
Roman sarcophagus featuring a drunk Dionysus flanked by personifications of the four seasons. Ca. 320-335 AD. Rome, Baths of Diocletian (inv. 407).
Sarcophagus featuring a drunk Dionysus flanked by personifications of the four seasons. Ca. 320-335 AD. Rome, Baths of Diocletian (inv. 407).
Detail of a Roman sarcophagus featuring a drunk Dionysus flanked by personifications of the four seasons. Ca. 320-335 AD. Rome, Baths of Diocletian (inv. 407).

This sarcophagus is centered on the figure of Dionysus, god of wine, shown too intoxicated to stand.  A helpful Satyr, a member of the god's debauched retinue, has to prop the tipsy deity up.  Flanking Dionysus on both sides are personifications of the four seasons, symbols of plenty and abundance.

I feature this piece, however, not for its endearing subject matter, but for its sculptural technique.  It illustrates Roman carvers' ever greater reliance on the drill.

Although the drill had been employed for working marble as far back as the Archaic period in Greece and was already widely used by the Early Classical period, nothing compared to the popularity it enjoyed in Roman hands, where it was used to render a wide variety of surface effects.  This depended on a fundamental change in attitude towards traces of tooling:  a willingness among Romans to advertise, rather than hide, tool marks.  This stood in marked contrast to earlier practice.  Greek sculptors had already employed the drill extensively for carving; but the Archaic and Classical ideal was a final surface devoid of any trace of tooling.  Hence sculptors of these periods took obsessive care to efface all such marks, whether of chisel or drill.  Hellenistic carvers show greater tolerance for tool marks, and extend this even to the drill, whose traces they often leave.  But it is Roman sculptors who purposefully showcase the tool, actively foregrounding its distinctive optical bite.

This flashy use of the drill for visual effects on sarcophagi seems to begin a little after the middle of the second century, in the mid-Antonine period.  Used very sparingly at first, it was gradually put to ever greater use.  By the latter part of the third century its grooves, channels, and isolated bore holes had taken over the carved surface, becoming the main means of rendering optical effects.  This was especially the case in the face and hair of figures.

As illustration of this artistic mode, consider the sarcophagus here, a piece likely carved during the reign of Constantine.  Cast your eyes on the tiny cupid perched on the shoulder of the third season from the left.  The detail shot makes things clear:  his wee face has been given ‘features’ not through any plastic modeling with the chisel, but by simply drilling six holes into his amorphous blob of a head to index the eyes, nostrils, and the corners of the mouth.

You can't help but think that this shouldn't work, because the style produces an utterly unrealistic surface.  The real human form is not, after all, pockmarked and beehived with numerous cavernous holes.  Yet this seldom strikes the viewer.  This is because the drillwork serves as highly effective visual accenting:  since the holes are used to emphasize areas where the eye is normally arrested anyway (the genitals, for example, or the eye itself), or features that the eye is normally accustomed to differentiating (such as the point near the knuckles where the fingers separate), its optical effects are often perceived as ‘naturalistic’ — especially at a distance — even though the impossible surface form that it produces is profoundly artificial.
Comments warmly invited.
(The Facebook system below, and the traditional comment form, work equally well.)
Comments

    Roman
    Sarcophagus
    News

    A venue for announcing all that's new and noteworthy in the burgeoning field of sarcophagus studies.

    I hope you, gentle readers, will help make this a collective endeavor.  Should you come across anything new pertaining to Roman sarcophagi — whether a recent article or book addressing them, an exhibition or website featuring them, or an excavation uncovering them — please let me know so I can share it here.


    Categories

    All
    Amazons
    Aphrodisian
    Bucolic
    Carving Technique
    Christian
    Dionysiac
    Discovered / Recovered
    Display Context
    Docimean
    Etruscan
    Gender
    Hercules
    Inscription
    Life And Death
    Lions
    Marine
    Musings On Select Pieces
    Mythology
    New - Article / Chapter
    New - Book / Diss.
    New - Exhibition
    New - Lecture / Paper
    Portraits
    Reuse
    Strigillated

    Archives

    November 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    July 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013

    Subscribe

    Picture
    via RSS Feed

    Picture
    via Email

home
curriculum vitae

          conference sessions organized
          conference papers
          education
          fellowships
          invited lectures
          publications

teaching
roman sarcophagus news (blog)
Mont Allen
Associate Professor of Classics & Art History
Dept. of Languages, Cultures, & International Trade
1000 Faner Drive, MC 4521
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL  62901
+1 (618) 303-6553

email
background:  sarcophagus showing Selene approaching the sleeping Endymion (New York, Metropolitan Museum, inv. 47.100.4a,b)